monday
S- 1 hour
thursday-
2 hours on project
saturday/sunday-
2 hours on project
5 hours
Monday, May 12, 2014
Human nature to be wicked
We talked about if this was going to be about bad people doing evil things or if it was going to show someone's descent from "good" to evil. It has shown Macbeth's fall. He was a loved nobleman who was all about kind and country until he heard a prophecy saying he would be king and then told his wife about it. Macbeth went very quickly from standing on one side of the bloody stream to wading into the middle, as he says it, very quickly, and I think it supports the idea that he did in fact start on the side, being safe and good.
I also think that Lady Macbeth's character shows almost the opposite. She was evil enough to encourage and go though with killing the king, but in neither of the two philosophies did we discuss talk doing evil can spark a need for good and a sudden cowardice.
I also think that Lady Macbeth's character shows almost the opposite. She was evil enough to encourage and go though with killing the king, but in neither of the two philosophies did we discuss talk doing evil can spark a need for good and a sudden cowardice.
Monday, May 5, 2014
macbeth quote and reading times
" Glamis thou art, and Cowdor, and shalt be
What thou art promised. Yet do I fear thy nature;
It is too full o' th' milk oh human kindness
To catch the nearest way. Thou wouldst be great,
Art not without ambition, but without
The illness should attend it. What thou wouldst highly,
That wouldst thou holily; wouldst not play false
And yet wouldst wrongly win. ---"
Act 1 scene 5
Lady Macbeth
I think this quote is important because it is showing someone very close to Macbeth talking about how he couldn't handle killing someone he knows. It makes a point to show just how lacking he has of the "illness" or evilness to kill Duncan, and can explain any aftermath of the event and how it takes a toll on his consciousness and behavior.
This also gives contrast to the future Macbeth, how he acts and treats people later. It can show if Macbeth develops this "illness" or if he fully regrets his actions. It seems almost like a theory for a philosopher over human nature. Are people naturally evil or does it develop with their actions? In Macbeth almost shows how evil already existed in Macbeth; enough for him to consider killing Duncan, and how it grows when his wife convinces him to kill Duncan and how it gets out of control from there.
reading:
S- 1 hour
Portfolio- 2 hours
3 hours
What thou art promised. Yet do I fear thy nature;
It is too full o' th' milk oh human kindness
To catch the nearest way. Thou wouldst be great,
Art not without ambition, but without
The illness should attend it. What thou wouldst highly,
That wouldst thou holily; wouldst not play false
And yet wouldst wrongly win. ---"
Act 1 scene 5
Lady Macbeth
I think this quote is important because it is showing someone very close to Macbeth talking about how he couldn't handle killing someone he knows. It makes a point to show just how lacking he has of the "illness" or evilness to kill Duncan, and can explain any aftermath of the event and how it takes a toll on his consciousness and behavior.
This also gives contrast to the future Macbeth, how he acts and treats people later. It can show if Macbeth develops this "illness" or if he fully regrets his actions. It seems almost like a theory for a philosopher over human nature. Are people naturally evil or does it develop with their actions? In Macbeth almost shows how evil already existed in Macbeth; enough for him to consider killing Duncan, and how it grows when his wife convinces him to kill Duncan and how it gets out of control from there.
reading:
S- 1 hour
Portfolio- 2 hours
3 hours
Monday, April 28, 2014
free post
What are you supposed to do when your coach goes insane and is attempting to kill you?
I'm not saying one practice. I'm saying all practices for a month (thats eight every week) she's giving you and your teammates ridiculous sets that eventually get so difficult because your whole team is so fatigued that some people are getting sick and falling off of blocks at practice and even at a meet we had.
I don't know if you (reader) know anything about swimming, but for reference a mile is 66 laps. If that was the amount we did in a practice it would be easy. But when the main set is equivalent of 2x that; (132 laps) where you are expected to go "ALL OUT" (asap) and stay off your best times by 1 second with three seconds rest between. All of that AFTER warm up and "pre set" sets that were also ridiculous; and then after swim practice is over the team is expected to get out and go to the weight room for an hour (after a 3 hour swim practice) where the same coach tells you to do weight amount that no female distance swimmer is supposed to do. Again, people falling under the weights that the coach tells them to do and then expected to pick it back up and do it again.
I foolishly thought maybe she was only killing us because we were off for spring break and that it would not be as crazy after, but when I got to practice and the main set was ALL OUT two laps over 2 miles (134 laps) and came to the realization that the entire team is now fatigued, in pain, sick, and because of break everyone is also out of shape so basically the set sucked and my coach continues to be insane. Coach explaining the set:
Coach: "main set starts with a 200 (8laps) on 2:30, a 225(9laps) on 2:50, and a 250(10laps) on 3:00"
Teammate: "And then do it again. Twice."
Coach: "Yep. and then the next part…"
I am extremely conflicted because this has been my coach since I was eight, she usually makes good choices for us, and she can usually tell when to back off. Talking to her today, she said my sickness/fatigue probably has nothing to do with how swimming has been going.
Ok so I know that was a rant and you probably didn't want to read about that, and I know it was longer than a blog post is supposed to be but it has been a problem and its on my mind right now.
I'm not saying one practice. I'm saying all practices for a month (thats eight every week) she's giving you and your teammates ridiculous sets that eventually get so difficult because your whole team is so fatigued that some people are getting sick and falling off of blocks at practice and even at a meet we had.
I don't know if you (reader) know anything about swimming, but for reference a mile is 66 laps. If that was the amount we did in a practice it would be easy. But when the main set is equivalent of 2x that; (132 laps) where you are expected to go "ALL OUT" (asap) and stay off your best times by 1 second with three seconds rest between. All of that AFTER warm up and "pre set" sets that were also ridiculous; and then after swim practice is over the team is expected to get out and go to the weight room for an hour (after a 3 hour swim practice) where the same coach tells you to do weight amount that no female distance swimmer is supposed to do. Again, people falling under the weights that the coach tells them to do and then expected to pick it back up and do it again.
I foolishly thought maybe she was only killing us because we were off for spring break and that it would not be as crazy after, but when I got to practice and the main set was ALL OUT two laps over 2 miles (134 laps) and came to the realization that the entire team is now fatigued, in pain, sick, and because of break everyone is also out of shape so basically the set sucked and my coach continues to be insane. Coach explaining the set:
Coach: "main set starts with a 200 (8laps) on 2:30, a 225(9laps) on 2:50, and a 250(10laps) on 3:00"
Teammate: "And then do it again. Twice."
Coach: "Yep. and then the next part…"
I am extremely conflicted because this has been my coach since I was eight, she usually makes good choices for us, and she can usually tell when to back off. Talking to her today, she said my sickness/fatigue probably has nothing to do with how swimming has been going.
Ok so I know that was a rant and you probably didn't want to read about that, and I know it was longer than a blog post is supposed to be but it has been a problem and its on my mind right now.
reading over spring break
thursday april 17th
2 hours ~ Anna Karenina
Friday April 18th
3 ½ hours ~ Anna Karenina
Saturday
1 hour ~ Anna Karenina
Sunday
2 hours~ Anna Karenina
Monday
2 ½ hours ~ Anna Karenina
Tues
3 hours ~Eleanor and Park
Wed
1 ½ hours ~ S (ship of theseus)
thursday
1 hour ~ S
Friday
20 mins ~ S
Saturday
2 hours ~ S
18 hours 50 mins
All there is to do on the sailboat and on airplanes was read and sleep… It looks unrealistic but really its all I did. Pretty sure my parents thought I was a waste of space sitting in the cabin reading all day.
2 hours ~ Anna Karenina
Friday April 18th
3 ½ hours ~ Anna Karenina
Saturday
1 hour ~ Anna Karenina
Sunday
2 hours~ Anna Karenina
Monday
2 ½ hours ~ Anna Karenina
Tues
3 hours ~Eleanor and Park
Wed
1 ½ hours ~ S (ship of theseus)
thursday
1 hour ~ S
Friday
20 mins ~ S
Saturday
2 hours ~ S
18 hours 50 mins
All there is to do on the sailboat and on airplanes was read and sleep… It looks unrealistic but really its all I did. Pretty sure my parents thought I was a waste of space sitting in the cabin reading all day.
Sunday, April 13, 2014
who we are
Who we are is not fixed. There will never be a moment in time where someone is the exact same person they were the day before. We are what we know; we know what our parents talk about and their opinions on it, we know what our teachers teach us and how we feel about it, we know what we see others do, the music we hear and the music we like, and what we see on the TV and internet. As each day passes we have thoughts about these things and more. Even if its only one thing a day, you make a decision about something that you just learned or something you hadn't really thought about before. Your one decision makes the way you think different, and that changes the way you see it, and so the next day if you see something related to it your reaction is different than the day before.
Those changes can be very small or so obvious that people comment on it, but either way it makes you different. Being fixed would mean that on a chart, your results would be the same every day, all your life. If the chart was on your favorite song, it would stay the same thing every time, you would always be in the same mood, your opinion on things would never change; and that all just sounds so boring.
reading times:
wed/Thurs/friday- nervous conditions 3 hours
Monday/Tuesday- Anna Karenina- 1 and a half hours
4 and a half hours
Those changes can be very small or so obvious that people comment on it, but either way it makes you different. Being fixed would mean that on a chart, your results would be the same every day, all your life. If the chart was on your favorite song, it would stay the same thing every time, you would always be in the same mood, your opinion on things would never change; and that all just sounds so boring.
reading times:
wed/Thurs/friday- nervous conditions 3 hours
Monday/Tuesday- Anna Karenina- 1 and a half hours
4 and a half hours
basic human nature
Everyone is capable of lying, betrayal, and violence. It does't mean everyone always resorts to it, but everyone is capable of it and I'm am very sure there is no one who hasn't ever gone to it. This is assuming there is no limit on how big the lie or betrayal is, and how bad the violence is; as in it goes from white lie to lying about something like crashing someone's car. I'm not saying the human race is all horrible and everyone lies, betrays, and commits violent acts. There are people that do all those things a lot, but there are also people that just tell a small lie and the guilt kills them. Betrayal is something that isn't always intentional, or it's just impossible to avoid.
Human nature is to survive in a way that causes your body the least harm. Stress is one of the things that your body wants to avoid, so if you believe that somehow your telling the truth would cause stress, or that betraying or hurting someone will make things easier for you; that makes it human nature to do so.
Human nature is to survive in a way that causes your body the least harm. Stress is one of the things that your body wants to avoid, so if you believe that somehow your telling the truth would cause stress, or that betraying or hurting someone will make things easier for you; that makes it human nature to do so.
Wednesday, February 26, 2014
Monday, February 17, 2014
reading times
thursday February 13th
2 hours- Eleanor and Park
friday February 14th
30 mins- ^ same book
total 150 mins
2 hours- Eleanor and Park
friday February 14th
30 mins- ^ same book
total 150 mins
poem
Words hidden;
Locked away.
Break down my door;
hear what I have to say.
The match in your hand;
drop it and step away.
After all this time
you forgot to stay
When the lights go out
you will be finding way.
You can spend your night
waiting for the day.
Remember in the morning
you'll be okay
and you can fly
as high as a blue jay.
Rhyming, every other line ending with -ay
End-stopped line
Enjambment
Caesuras
4 or 5 stanzas
bold- I originally had this written alone, but the requirement was much longer.
Locked away.
Break down my door;
hear what I have to say.
The match in your hand;
drop it and step away.
After all this time
you forgot to stay
When the lights go out
you will be finding way.
You can spend your night
waiting for the day.
Remember in the morning
you'll be okay
and you can fly
as high as a blue jay.
Rhyming, every other line ending with -ay
End-stopped line
Enjambment
Caesuras
4 or 5 stanzas
bold- I originally had this written alone, but the requirement was much longer.
"You Found Me"
http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/fray/youfoundme.html
Well to start the first time I really listened to this song was on the way to New Orleans going over the last bridge. I can't really describe how it made me feel, because I can't really relate to part of it, but the other half I can relate to much more than I would think. First of all, the song is about God, and its not at all a song to praise God; more acknowledging his existence and expressing feeling about it. He says God is someone he stumbled upon on the corner of the street smoking a cigarette, and thats not exactly the traditional appearance of God.
"I found God
On the corner of First and Amistad
Where the west
Was all but won
All alone
Smoking his last cigarette
I said, "Where you been?"
He said, "Ask anything"."
Then he basically goes on to say that god has "some kind of nerve" for waiting to come find to him.
"Why'd you have to wait?
Where were you? Where were you?
Just a little late."
He uses a lot of anaphoras, as a bunch of songs do, to create emphasis and to sound good. Also talking about God and his friend that sounded like she died is apostrophe. It doesn't rhyme; and there is enjambment along with end-stopped line.
As for SOAPSTONE:
Speaker- Isaac Slade (assuming as the lead singer and writer of the song) It seems more personal than something a singer writes from another narrator in mind.
Occasion- He feels like he had a horrible time and now suddenly God decides to show up after its over
Audience- He's talking to God, but he knew in writing the song it would be for general hearing
Purpose- to express a disappointment in God but also an understanding that he exists
Subject- having that "ah-ha" moment when you find God or he finds you, and how the speaker feels God was late
Tone- disappointment, frustration
Well to start the first time I really listened to this song was on the way to New Orleans going over the last bridge. I can't really describe how it made me feel, because I can't really relate to part of it, but the other half I can relate to much more than I would think. First of all, the song is about God, and its not at all a song to praise God; more acknowledging his existence and expressing feeling about it. He says God is someone he stumbled upon on the corner of the street smoking a cigarette, and thats not exactly the traditional appearance of God.
"I found God
On the corner of First and Amistad
Where the west
Was all but won
All alone
Smoking his last cigarette
I said, "Where you been?"
He said, "Ask anything"."
Then he basically goes on to say that god has "some kind of nerve" for waiting to come find to him.
"Why'd you have to wait?
Where were you? Where were you?
Just a little late."
He uses a lot of anaphoras, as a bunch of songs do, to create emphasis and to sound good. Also talking about God and his friend that sounded like she died is apostrophe. It doesn't rhyme; and there is enjambment along with end-stopped line.
As for SOAPSTONE:
Speaker- Isaac Slade (assuming as the lead singer and writer of the song) It seems more personal than something a singer writes from another narrator in mind.
Occasion- He feels like he had a horrible time and now suddenly God decides to show up after its over
Audience- He's talking to God, but he knew in writing the song it would be for general hearing
Purpose- to express a disappointment in God but also an understanding that he exists
Subject- having that "ah-ha" moment when you find God or he finds you, and how the speaker feels God was late
Tone- disappointment, frustration
Monday, February 10, 2014
reading times
friday feb 6th
1 1/2 hours Fall of Five
Saturday feb 9th
1 hour Eleanor and Pack by rainbow rowell
total
150 mins
1 1/2 hours Fall of Five
Saturday feb 9th
1 hour Eleanor and Pack by rainbow rowell
total
150 mins
Tuesday, February 4, 2014
draft
For this draft I'm concerned about how my points came out; if they were hard to grasp, because the only way to really write about Cleopatra is to tell her story, and making a point within the story without losing your reader isn't exactly easy.
Also with using sources, all my sources basically said the same things, so I didn't know which articles to link the facts from.
Also with using sources, all my sources basically said the same things, so I didn't know which articles to link the facts from.
free post
Recently I've been attempting to understand people better. Not specific people, just people. For the most part the way people act and what they talk about leaves me absolutely stunned at how little they see. Why can't people just pay attention and get it right? But then I stopped and remembered how life works. Everyone has thoughts, everyone has problems. Only sometimes the answer is right in front of them and they can't see it, and all I can think is, why not? Sometimes people think I'm not smart because I pay attention to things and miss small things that truthfully, I don't care about. But for some reason things that matter even seem obstructed to most people.
One thing I've decided is that most people don't like to listen; they won't listen to something and then consider it. They're stubborn so whatever someone says is wrong. Not in every situation, but when the atmosphere is in a place where people get aggravated, listening to someone becomes hard. Its like how everyone forgets how to drive whenever it rains. Most generalizations I made about people were like that, so then I tried to figure out why people disturb me so much, what is the reason I don't see things like they do? First of all, I ask weird questions to myself, questions with no real answer but a ton of possible theories. Not sure if other people do that, but if I gave examples I'm sure that the questions wouldn't even make sense. I never seem to make sense, when I try to explain something I either find that I need to shut up because no one gets it, or I end up talking to someone about it until neither one of us still understands what we're saying; it builds up to get beyond us.
I still don't understand how people bother me so much though. If too many people talk at once, whether or not its to me, I end up wanting to scream until everyone shuts up. And just about everything people do makes me stop and just kind of think, "what? but why?"
One thing I've decided is that most people don't like to listen; they won't listen to something and then consider it. They're stubborn so whatever someone says is wrong. Not in every situation, but when the atmosphere is in a place where people get aggravated, listening to someone becomes hard. Its like how everyone forgets how to drive whenever it rains. Most generalizations I made about people were like that, so then I tried to figure out why people disturb me so much, what is the reason I don't see things like they do? First of all, I ask weird questions to myself, questions with no real answer but a ton of possible theories. Not sure if other people do that, but if I gave examples I'm sure that the questions wouldn't even make sense. I never seem to make sense, when I try to explain something I either find that I need to shut up because no one gets it, or I end up talking to someone about it until neither one of us still understands what we're saying; it builds up to get beyond us.
I still don't understand how people bother me so much though. If too many people talk at once, whether or not its to me, I end up wanting to scream until everyone shuts up. And just about everything people do makes me stop and just kind of think, "what? but why?"
reading times
wednesday
1 hour- redoing notecards and detailed outline
thursday
45 mins- redoing NC and detailed outline
Sunday-
2 hours 30 mins- draft
total: 4 hours 15 mins
1 hour- redoing notecards and detailed outline
thursday
45 mins- redoing NC and detailed outline
Sunday-
2 hours 30 mins- draft
total: 4 hours 15 mins
Monday, January 27, 2014
Reading
the fall of five
1/25 - 1 1/2 hours
Death at pemberly (can't spell)
1/22 - 45 mins
total - 135 mins
1/25 - 1 1/2 hours
Death at pemberly (can't spell)
1/22 - 45 mins
total - 135 mins
explaining topic to a friend
So I'm doing a national history day project for my english and social studies classes, and the topic had to have something to do with rights and responsibilities, which is a bit aggravating. I apparently could not make my brain process while choosing topics, so my project is on Cleopatra's responsibilities to Egypt. When we started research I wasn't sure whether I thought there was a surprising amount of resources or if I thought there would be more. I guess I didn't think that the Romans were writing stories down.
At first I thought that Cleopatra would turn out to be a ruler that didn't think much about Egypt, and just did whatever to stay in charge and powerful (which is true to a point) but I had no idea she made the efforts she did to be closer to the Egyptians than her ancestry, who did not actually originate in Egypt. She was the first in her family to learn to speak Egyptian, and as a result of some of her endeavors, Egypt managed to gain enough riches to go from being a weak country to a strong one that the Romans eventually asked for financial and navy aid. Though her methods for getting power and making "allies" was unseemly, it did work for a long time.
Rome was a rapidly expanding empire, and if it hadn't been for Cleopatra, I don't think Egypt would have been around as long as it was, and it's eventual fall to Rome seems almost impossible.
At first I thought that Cleopatra would turn out to be a ruler that didn't think much about Egypt, and just did whatever to stay in charge and powerful (which is true to a point) but I had no idea she made the efforts she did to be closer to the Egyptians than her ancestry, who did not actually originate in Egypt. She was the first in her family to learn to speak Egyptian, and as a result of some of her endeavors, Egypt managed to gain enough riches to go from being a weak country to a strong one that the Romans eventually asked for financial and navy aid. Though her methods for getting power and making "allies" was unseemly, it did work for a long time.
Rome was a rapidly expanding empire, and if it hadn't been for Cleopatra, I don't think Egypt would have been around as long as it was, and it's eventual fall to Rome seems almost impossible.
Monday, January 20, 2014
reading
The Absolutely true diary of a part-time indian:
1 hour 1/14
2 hours 1/15
The fall of five:
20 mins
total: 200mins
3 hours 20 mins
1 hour 1/14
2 hours 1/15
The fall of five:
20 mins
total: 200mins
3 hours 20 mins
Monday, January 13, 2014
World history day project
To be honest, I'm more or less drowning in my topic in that I'm not sure where I'm really going with it. It's on Cleopatra, and though obviously I am not able to get primary sources regarding Cleopatra (due to my lack of ability to translate roman records or so much as get a look at them) lots of people like to tell the Queen's story. Some are all-for her, mostly due to some idea that the dead queen proves something about the significance of women and rights to having rights and education and such, while others basically label her as a ruler whose tactic was to sleep with potential allies. But both manage to agree that she pulled Egypt up into a time of wealth and prosperity, enough to a point of Rome asking Egypt for financial and navy aid. Which I suppose means that she was a responsible ruler up until the eventual point of Egypt's fall to Rome and her suicide.
Also being a "divine ruler" there wasn't really any guidelines she had to follow. She was somehow entitled to the right of doing absolutely anything. So in the end, which way does the scale tilt towards? Did Cleopatra tend to her responsibilities as best she could, and use her power to do anything in a way that was right, or does none of that amount to the loss of Egypt to the Romans?
As for my plans this week, I need to see my teacher about my bibliographies, and work on finalizing them for thursday.
reading:
the absolutely true diary of a part-time indian
friday jan 10th - 20 mins
sun jan 12th- 40 mins
Hex Hall
Saturday january 11th- 1 1/2 hours
(and though I don't think comic books count, I spent about 25 mins reading some new ones this weekend)
total: 150 mins
Also being a "divine ruler" there wasn't really any guidelines she had to follow. She was somehow entitled to the right of doing absolutely anything. So in the end, which way does the scale tilt towards? Did Cleopatra tend to her responsibilities as best she could, and use her power to do anything in a way that was right, or does none of that amount to the loss of Egypt to the Romans?
As for my plans this week, I need to see my teacher about my bibliographies, and work on finalizing them for thursday.
reading:
the absolutely true diary of a part-time indian
friday jan 10th - 20 mins
sun jan 12th- 40 mins
Hex Hall
Saturday january 11th- 1 1/2 hours
(and though I don't think comic books count, I spent about 25 mins reading some new ones this weekend)
total: 150 mins
Evil
Well theres different types of evil. Theres the little kid that intentionally ruins your life crying to make everyone hate you, all the way to something like "the first (evil)" in Buffy the Vampire slayer that attempts to usher an apocalypse.
I think of evil as the human impulse to want to cause others some emotional or physical pain. In a way I believe that all authors of every book/comic book I have ever read, and directors of all the TV shows I have ever watched, those authors and directors clearly live to cause me pain, and therefore are obviously evil.
My cross fit coach is an embodiment of evil. "First one to pass out gets to go home," is not exactly the words coming from a coach that cares. Besides, anyone who forces uncoordinated swimmers onto a field to run a 5k after a three hour swim practice and 3 other cross fit sets in 30 degree weather is clearly trying to kill us, to say nothing of the practices he decides to do in the pool. I hate underwaters enough during practice, but when I try to go back to back fifties(2 laps) underwater with one breath, it reaches a new level.
Heck, I'm going to mention another specific time. "Bailey I want you to do a breaststroke underwater (1 lap) and then you can get out." so I thought to my self, cool thats easy. Of course my dad happened to be there and felt the need to tell my coach it was too easy (after I already did it), which resulted in an sprint fifty(2 laps) with no breaths, and if I made it everyone got to leave.
I also think I came face to face with some evil that possessed the owner of my team when he came up to me before a race to tell me, "Pain is just a feeling like happy or sad." Didn't help me much but did succeed in scaring me half to death.
Of course those evils are not actually bad, just small little evils, but I'm not exactly in a great mood to write about serial killers and sadists and such.
I think of evil as the human impulse to want to cause others some emotional or physical pain. In a way I believe that all authors of every book/comic book I have ever read, and directors of all the TV shows I have ever watched, those authors and directors clearly live to cause me pain, and therefore are obviously evil.
My cross fit coach is an embodiment of evil. "First one to pass out gets to go home," is not exactly the words coming from a coach that cares. Besides, anyone who forces uncoordinated swimmers onto a field to run a 5k after a three hour swim practice and 3 other cross fit sets in 30 degree weather is clearly trying to kill us, to say nothing of the practices he decides to do in the pool. I hate underwaters enough during practice, but when I try to go back to back fifties(2 laps) underwater with one breath, it reaches a new level.
Heck, I'm going to mention another specific time. "Bailey I want you to do a breaststroke underwater (1 lap) and then you can get out." so I thought to my self, cool thats easy. Of course my dad happened to be there and felt the need to tell my coach it was too easy (after I already did it), which resulted in an sprint fifty(2 laps) with no breaths, and if I made it everyone got to leave.
I also think I came face to face with some evil that possessed the owner of my team when he came up to me before a race to tell me, "Pain is just a feeling like happy or sad." Didn't help me much but did succeed in scaring me half to death.
Of course those evils are not actually bad, just small little evils, but I'm not exactly in a great mood to write about serial killers and sadists and such.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)